WEKO3
インデックスリンク
アイテム
組織行動論におけるワーク・エンゲージメントの概念的位置づけ:モティベーションとの概念比較
https://doi.org/10.15085/0002000135
https://doi.org/10.15085/0002000135a41b68ac-2a67-4255-8921-d226f22ecbf4
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
組織行動論におけるワーク・エンゲージメントの概念的位置づけ:モティベーションとの概念比較 (15 MB)
|
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2024-10-04 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | 組織行動論におけるワーク・エンゲージメントの概念的位置づけ:モティベーションとの概念比較 | |||||
言語 | ja | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | Positioning of the Work Engagement Concept in Organizational Behavior Theory : Conceptual Comparison with Motivation | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | ja | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 組織行動論 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | ja | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 人的資源管理論 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | ja | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | ワーク・エンゲージメント | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | ja | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | ジョブ・クラフティング | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | ja | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | モテイベーション | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Organizational Behavior | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Human Resource Management | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Work Engagement | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Job Crafting | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Motivation | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
ID登録 | ||||||
ID登録 | 10.15085/0002000135 | |||||
ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
著者 |
櫻木, 晃裕
× 櫻木, 晃裕× 太田, 顕一郎 |
|||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | In some cases, the system of organizatio叫behaviortheory can be used for accurate understanding of human perception or behavior in an organization. This study was aimed at selecting work engagement as an important concept for specifying organizational achievements. It clearly presents its conceptual positioning in the system of organizational behavior theory. This activity can be compared with motivation, a traditional concept in organizational behavior theory, as its fundamental viewpoint. First, P (performance) = £(ability x motivation) was presented as a function of motivation. Then the relations of the functions of motivation and ability for performance were described. Subsequently, two theoretical systems were presented, i.e., content theory and process theory, and theories comprising the theoretical systems. As practical development of the motivation theory, the study enabled extraction of individual's motivation scores and comparative analysis of the motivation scores by sex, age group, and sector by converting the theory to a measurable scale based on concept manipulation. Also the study explored how HRM measures can be proposed through the analysis of correlation with other concepts such as job satisfaction and regression analysis. The study also showed that, together with the definition first presented by Schaufeli et al. (2002), work engagement is a concept describing a sustainable and stable condition. The study elucidated the subordinate concepts comprising work engagement, functional characteristics, measurement scales, research findings in the past, recognition in Japan, and other details. The report also presented recognition that integration with Job Crafting is extremely important when assuming practical development in management. Finally, homogeneity and heterogeneity between work engagement and motivation and the conceptual positioning of work engagement in organizational behavior theory were presented. |
|||||
言語 | en | |||||
書誌情報 |
ja : 宮城大学研究ジャーナル en : Miyagi University Research Journal 巻 4, 号 1, p. 31-41, ページ数 11, 発行日 2024-09-30 |
|||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | 公立大学法人宮城大学 | |||||
言語 | ja | |||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | EISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 2436-374X |